Key scientific ideas and proposals.

The practical significance of the proposed distinction lies not only in the theoretical systematization of concepts, but also in the formation of different trust regimes and the use of the results of the respective types of expertise in law enforcement activities. Thus, scientific-legal expertise, having a norm-oriented character, is aimed primarily at assessing the quality of legal regulation and improving the regulatory framework. Its result performs a consultative function in the field of law-making and normative control. Scientific-juridical expertise, on the other hand, is the result of professional legal activity carried out in a specific law enforcement situation. Its distinctive feature is that it is based on professionalism, legal knowledge, experience and the methodology of scientific-legal argumentation. It is precisely this professional character that determines the elevated level of institutional and professional trust in its results.

Thus, the distinction between the concepts of “scientific-legal expertise” and “scientific-juridical expertise” makes it possible to: define the different nature of their subject matter and functions; justify different levels of trust in their results; explain the transformation of a consultative opinion into an actual basis for a law enforcement decision; lay the groundwork for the formation of a separate legal regime for scientific-juridical expertise as an independent and special form of expert activity in the law enforcement mechanism.Sonnet 4.6